During an address to the United Nations General Assembly, President Trump stated that his administration had successfully concluded seven international conflicts and brokered various peace agreements. The article reviews several specific instances cited by the President, comparing his assertions with subsequent developments and alternate perspectives.
Regarding the dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan, President Trump referred to an accord as a “glorious triumph.” However, reports indicate that comprehensive agreement talks have since faltered, and deadly fighting has continued.
In the context of relations between India and Pakistan, President Trump claimed credit for mediating a cease-fire following a terrorist attack in May. India, however, stated that Pakistani officials requested cease-fire talks due to pressure from Indian military operations.
President Trump also mentioned Kosovo and Serbia in his speech, yet no formal peace agreement has been signed between the two entities.
The article also notes instances where President Trump linked trade negotiations to conflict resolution, such as advising leaders of Thailand and Cambodia that trade talks would cease unless a cease-fire was agreed upon.
Critics of the administration’s diplomatic approach reportedly contend that interventions often did not address the underlying causes of the conflicts, suggesting limited resolution of disputes through this diplomacy.
Source: www.nytimes.com